Les cercles vicieux de la bureaucratie 2.1 Les théories des dysfonctions bureaucratiques 2.2 Le cercle vicieux bureaucratique de Michel Crozier Conclusion Bibliographie Max Weber fut le premier à étudier la bureaucratie en tant que mode d'organisation. Pour expliquer la genèse d'un tel système, Michel Crozier propose une théorie de l'organisation fondée sur l'analyse de la stratégie des individus et des groupes, et tenant compte des … He also was a fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, as well as a laureate of the Prix Alexis de Tocqueville (1997). Diplômé de l’Ecole des Hautes Etudes Commerciales, Docteur en droit, Docteur d’Etat ès Lettres, il est boursier des relations culturelles aux Etats-Unis (1947-1948), et ramène de son séjour un ouvrage sur les syndicats ouvriers américains. Try Pour rompre ce charme, il semblait espérer que les générations de jeunes hauts fonctionnaires des Grands Corps qui arriveraient aux commandes (sortis sans doute de l'ENA) seraient les moteurs du changement dans l'administration publique et dans la société. 7 people found this helpful. Pour expliquer la genèse d'un tel système, Michel Crozier propose une théorie de l'organisation fondée sur l'analyse de la stratégie des individus et des groupes, et tenant compte des traits culturels fondamentaux propres à chaque société. Read more. The originality of the study lies in its association of two widely different approaches: the theory of decision-making in large organizations and the cultural analysis of social patterns of action. It also discusses the evolution of citations from the first half of the 1980s and The Bureaucratic Phenomenon’s increasing prominence in research in the fields of organization and management studies. Motif: la bureaucratie, les blocages de sociétés de la France des années 60 ressemblent étrangement à ceux du Maroc des années 90. S'IL n'y avait qu'un seul sociologue français à lire, ce serait celui-là. (éd.). Loin des essais trop intellectuels pour être mis en oeuvre, Michel Crozier s'attache toujours à saisir la réalité du quotidien des organisations pour comprendre comment les … Our Contribution to Organizational Analysis" (with, "The Boundaries of Business: the Changing Organization" in. pour expliquer la genèse d'un tel système, michel crozier propose une théorie de l'organisation fondée sur l'analyse de la stratégie des individus et des groupes, et tenant compte des traits culturels fondamentaux propres à chaque société. Hello, Sign in. Le Phénomène bureaucratique, Michel Crozier : Le phénomène bureaucratique« Nous rejetons trop facilement nos difficultés sur des épouvantails abstraits comme le progrès, la technique, la bureaucratie Michel Crozier (6 November 1922, Sainte-Menehould, Marne – 24 May 2013, Paris) was a French sociologist and member of the Académie des sciences morales et politiques from 1999 until his death. © Oxford University Press, 2018. Il a été Professeur de sociologie à l'Université Paris X-Nanterre, de 1967 à 1968. Bien entendu, il a existé des bureaucraties avant lui. "The relational Boundaries of Rationality" in: K.R. Le phénomène bureaucratique, essai sur les tendances bureaucratiques des systèmes d'organisation modernes et sur leurs relations en France avec le système social et culturel, Paris, Editions du Seuil, 1963, 416 p., 24 F. Michel Crozier (6 November 1922, Sainte-Menehould, Marne – 24 May 2013, Paris) was a French sociologist and member of the Académie des sciences morales et politiques from 1999 until his death. Crozier, Michel. PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). 64 et 70. Finally, it analyzes Crozier’s intellectual background, his central arguments in The Bureaucratic Phenomenon, and the book’s contribution to contemporary research on bureaucracy. Back in France, he published a book on this research and joined the French National Center for Scientific Research as a sociologist. (31) Crozier, Voir Michel, article cité, Sociologie du travail, II (1960), pp. Michel Crozier is the author of over 20 books and 80 articles mostly written in French. Ce phénomène contre lequel nous nous révoltons n'est que le legs paralysant du passé. La bureaucratie renvoie au gouvernement des bureaux, c’est-à-dire de l’administration, appareil d’État constitué de fonctionnaires, organisé hiérarchiquement et selon des procédures juridiques. Please subscribe or login to access full text content. In this book, which established the sociology of organizations as a discipline in France, Michel Crozier sketched out the bases of what would later on become the "strategic analysis of organizations.". Michel Crozier. Et pourtant la bureaucratie … Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Handbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice). In 1959, he was invited to the Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences at Palo Alto. The international success of The Bureaucratic Phenomenon provided him with the reputation and the resources to found the Center for the Sociology of Organizations (CSO), a small research group of young sociologists, with whom he embarked on a new research program on French Administration and Change, and pursued the theoretical and methodological elaboration of his approach to the study of organizations. Key, Jr., Public Opinion and American Democracy, Michel Crozier, The Bureaucratic Phenomenon, Theodore J. Lowi, “American Business, Public Policy, Case Studies and Political Theory”, Aaron Wildavsky, The Politics of the Budgetary Process, Mancur Olson, The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups, Theodore J. Lowi, The End of Liberalism: The Second Republic of the United States, Jack L. Walker, “The Diffusion of Innovations among the American States”, Albert O. Hirschman, Exit, Voice and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States, Graham T. Allison, The Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis, George J. Stigler, “The Theory of Economic Regulation”, Michael D. Cohen, James G. March, and Johan P. Olsen, “A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice”, Anthony Downs, “Up and Down with Ecology: The ‘Issue-Attention’ Cycle”, Carol H. Weiss, Evaluation Research: Methods for Studying Programs and Policies, Jeffrey L. Pressman and Aaron B. Wildavsky, Implementation, Oliver E. Williamson, Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications, Hugh Heclo, “Issue Networks and the Executive Establishment”, Michael Lipsky, Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Service, Richard Rose, Do Parties Make a Difference?, John W. Kingdon, Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies, Mathew D. McCubbins and Thomas Schwartz, “Congressional Oversight Overlooked: Police Patrols versus Fire Alarms”, Terry M. Moe, “The New Economics of Organization”, Mathew D. McCubbins, Roger G. Noll, and Barry R. Weingast, “Administrative Procedures as Instruments of Political Control”, Paul A. Sabatier, “An Advocacy Coalition Framework of Policy Change and the Role of Policy-Oriented Learning Therein”, Fritz W. Scharpf, “The Joint-Decision Trap: Lessons from German Federalism and European Integration”, James Q. Wilson, Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do and Why they Do it, Elinor Ostrom, Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action, Christopher Hood, “A Public Management for All Seasons?”, Ian Ayres and John Braithwaite, Responsive Regulation: Transcending the Deregulation Debate, Frank R. Baumgartner and Bryan D. Jones, Agendas and Instability in American Politics, Robert D. Putnam, Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community: Empirical Foundations, Causal Mechanisms, and Policy Implications, Peter A. Professor Crozier never considered sociology and sociological theorizing as an end in itself. [22] François Chaubet, « Michel Crozier et le CSO, un entrepreneur sociologique de la réforme de l’État », op.cit . Hall and David Soskice, Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Michel Crozier, The Bureaucratic Phenomenon - Oxford Handbooks Michel Crozier precise que son livre s'attache exclusivement a ce dernier usage du terme. Review Mayer Zald (University of Michigan), Learn how and when to remove this template message, Académie des sciences morales et politiques, Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences, The Crisis of Democracy: On the Governability of Democracies, Michel Crozier, member of the French "Académie des sciences morales et politiques", Michel Crozier on Encyclopædia Britannica, "En 1979, déjà, Michel Crozier envisageait de supprimer l'ENA...", biography on the website of the research centre CSO, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Michel_Crozier&oldid=994361206, Members of the Académie des sciences morales et politiques, Fellows of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, Commanders of the National Order of Merit (France), BLP articles lacking sources from June 2012, Wikipedia articles with BIBSYS identifiers, Wikipedia articles with CANTIC identifiers, Wikipedia articles with CINII identifiers, Wikipedia articles with PLWABN identifiers, Wikipedia articles with SUDOC identifiers, Wikipedia articles with Trove identifiers, Wikipedia articles with WORLDCATID identifiers, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License, "Organization and Collective Action. Michel Crozier a fondé, e… [byrokratik] adjectif bureaucratic, administrative Michel Crozier. En pratique, dès lors, les tentatives de réforme du système activent encore plus intensément les luttes de pouvoir en son sein, chaque acteur s’efforçant de protéger sa zone d’incertitude, voire, si possible, de l’étendre aux dépens des perdants de la transformation. Ce phénomène contre lequel nous nous révoltons n'est que le legs paralysant du passé. This chapter examines Michel Crozier’s The Bureaucratic Phenomenon, an in-depth study of public administration in France in which he challenged the view that overemphasizes the formal and rational organizational structure of bureaucracy. Il est diplômé d'HEC. Michel CROZIER, Le phénomène bureaucratique, Editions du Seuil, 1963, réédition de 2005, 380 pages environ. In The Bureaucratic Phenomenon Michel Crozier demonstrates that bureaucratic institutions need to be understood in terms of the cultural context in which they operate. Michel Crozier dans Le phénomène bureaucratique (1976) montre que l’organisation bureaucratique est génératrice d’un effet pervers majeur.